Sa'id v. City of Alexandria

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sa'id v. City of Alexandria

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1813

MUSTAFA H. SA’ID,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA; KERRY J. DONLEY; ROSE WILLIAMS BOYDE; REDELLA S. PERPER; WILLIAM C. CLEVELAND; WILLIAM D. EUILLE; LONNIE C. RICH; DAVID SPEEK; LOIS LAWSON; THE CITY OF ALEX- ANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHARLES E. SAMARA, Police Chief, individually; POLICE OFFICER PORTEL; POLICE OFFICER CONNIFF; JOHN DOE, #1, Police Officer; MARY DOE, Police Officer; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-563-A)

Submitted: August 31, 1999 Decided: September 21, 1999

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mustafa H. Sa’id, Appellant Pro Se. George Arthur McAndrews, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa H. Sa’id appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Sa’id v. City of Alexandria, No. CA-99-563-A

(E.D. Va. June 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished