Bonds v. Norfolk Southern
Bonds v. Norfolk Southern
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1802
JEROME RUSLEY BONDS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-500-7)
Submitted: August 31, 1999 Decided: September 21, 1999
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Rusley Bonds, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Agnis Chandra Chakravorty, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jerome Bonds appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Norfolk Southern Railway Company on
Bonds’ claims of employment related discrimination. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17
(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bonds v.
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., No. CA-98-500-7 (W.D. Va. May 18,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished