United States v. Mazique

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mazique

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICKEY MAZIQUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-95-19)

Submitted: August 5, 1999 Decided: August 11, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rickey Mazique, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ricky Mazique appeals from the district court’s order denying

his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s order and find no reversible error. The issue

raised in Mazique’s motion was decided against him on direct

appeal. Accordingly, we affirl the district court’s order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished