Aldana-Archila v. Reno
Aldana-Archila v. Reno
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1430
FELIX ORLANDO ALDANA-ARCHILA,
Petitioner,
versus
JANET RENO, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A-72-349-427)
Submitted: September 8, 1999 Decided: September 30, 1999
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN,* Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul S. Allen, Pauline M. Schwartz, PAUL SHEARMAN ALLEN & ASSO- CIATES, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Ellen Sue Shapiro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
* Judge Ervin was assigned to the panel in this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. S 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Felix Orlando Aldana-Archila seeks review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals' (“Board”) decision and order affirm-
ing the immigration judge's denial of his application for waiver of
deportation. On petition for review, Aldana-Archila argues that
the immigration judge improperly admitted Form I-213 and Aldana-
Archila’s statements to INS officers to prove alienage. Our review
of the record discloses that the Board properly affirmed the
immigration judge’s decision and that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See In re:
Felix Orlando Aldana-Archila, No. A-72-349-427 (B.I.A. Mar. 4,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished