U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Gerald Felton

United States v. Gerald Felton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 27, 1999

United States v. Gerald Felton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6307

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

GERALD FELTON, a/k/a Big Mass, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-93-123-F)

Submitted: July 13, 1999 Decided: September 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerald Felton, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Gerald Felton seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion for an extension to file a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Felton, No. CR-93-123- F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9 & Mar. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.