United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RENE CECILIO WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-96-181, CA-99-897-2)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rene Cecilio Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rene Cecilio Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-96-181;
CA-99-897-2 (E.D. Va. July 1, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished