U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Turner

United States v. Turner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 1999

United States v. Turner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7086

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JEFFREY V. TURNER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-225, CA-96-293-3)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey V. Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey V. Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “motion for correction of clerical error made by in- advertence or mistake and to proceed on notice of appeal from the district court.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Turner, Nos. CR-90-225; CA-96-293-3 (S.D.W. Va. June 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.