U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Mills v. United States

Mills v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 1999

Mills v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6997

ROBERT MILLS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BLEDSOE, Warden, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CA-99-93-1)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 8, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Mills, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert Mills appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. United States, No. CA-99-93-1 (N.D.W. Va. July 7, 1999). The motion to expedite is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.