United States v. Widener

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Widener

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6886

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREG L. WIDENER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CR-97-30-A, CA-99-104-1-A)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greg L. Widener, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abington, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Greg L. Widener seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-

nying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. Widener, Nos. CR-97-30-A; CA-99-

104-1-A (W.D. Va. June 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished