United States v. Lambert
United States v. Lambert
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6861
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LOFTON HOWARD LAMBERT, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-5-C)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lofton Howard Lambert, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lofton Howard Lambert, III, appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct his sentence and other accompanying
motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lambert,
No. CR-93-5-C (W.D. Va. May 26, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished