U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

United States v. Lambert

United States v. Lambert
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 1999

United States v. Lambert

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6861

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

LOFTON HOWARD LAMBERT, III, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-5-C)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lofton Howard Lambert, III, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lofton Howard Lambert, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct his sentence and other accompanying motions. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lambert, No. CR-93-5-C (W.D. Va. May 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.