Harden v. Moore
Harden v. Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6825
WILLIAM G. HARDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CRAIG M. MOORE; JOHN C. BLACK; DEPUTY PACK; DEPUTY HAUSER; SERGEANT GRIFFIN; SERGEANT BAKER; MASTER DEPUTY GALE; MASTER DEPUTY J. A. ROBERTSON; ETTAPHINE P. JAMES-REID; JOYCE L. KROLAK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-498-6)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William G. Harden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William G. Harden appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Harden v. Moore, No. CA-99-498-6 (D.S.C. May 28, 1999). We deny
Harden’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished