Epps v. Wheeler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Epps v. Wheeler

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6839

RODERICK EPPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. WHEELER, Assistant Warden, Department of Corrections; S. JONES, Sargeant, Department of Corrections; W. ROSS, Sargeant, Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1427-2)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Roderick Epps appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Epps v. Wheeler, No. CA-98-1427-2 (E.D. Va.

June 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished