Epps v. Wheeler
Epps v. Wheeler
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6839
RODERICK EPPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. WHEELER, Assistant Warden, Department of Corrections; S. JONES, Sargeant, Department of Corrections; W. ROSS, Sargeant, Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1427-2)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Roderick Epps appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Epps v. Wheeler, No. CA-98-1427-2 (E.D. Va.
June 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished