UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2028

M. D. WILKINS, d/b/a M. D. Wilkins Funeral Home,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CYNTHIA S. WILKINS, a/k/a Taylor; SUZANNE L. NYFELER; JANET RENO; HELEN F. FAHEY; DAVID G. LOWE, Judge; ROBERT PAYNE, Judge; DOUGLAS O. TICE, JR., Judge; ROBERT SPENCER, Judge; DAVID ADAMS, Judge; RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Judge; NEIL O. REID; SHERMAN B. LUBMAN, Trustee; ROBERT HILL, attorney from Hill and Rainey; MELVIN ZIMM, from the law firm of Glasser and Glasser; SHELTON C. EASTER; GREGG R. NIVALA; MARIAN J. MARTIN; DONALD WEIN, Ford Consumer Finance,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-307-7)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. M. D. Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

M. D. Wilkins seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

dismissing without prejudice his Bivens* complaint and denying his

motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Wilkins v. Wilkins, No. CA-99-307-7 (W.D. Va. June 14

& July 28, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

(1971).

2