United States v. Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6612

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THEODORE ROOSEVELT JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-92-50, CA-98-252-1, CA-97-1097-1)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Roosevelt Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Theodore Roosevelt Johnson seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-

icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-92-50;

CA-98-252-1; CA-97-1097-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished