United States v. Ferguson
United States v. Ferguson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6553
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
COLUMBUS FERGUSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-268-P, CA-97-33-3-P)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Columbus Ferguson, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Columbus Ferguson appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ferguson, Nos. CR-92-268-P; CA-97-33-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 1999). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.