Stearnsmiller v. Taylor
Stearnsmiller v. Taylor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6217
RICK STEARNSMILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR; DORIS MIXON; JOHN DOE, 1- 20; WILLIE EAGLETON; GEORGIA YEARWOOD; MICHAEL W. MOORE; DOUG CATOE; FRANCES L. STROKER; SAMUEL LATTA; GEORGE BEST, Captain; EICHEN- BURGER, Captain; BOARD OF CORRECTIONS; CORREC- TIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE; REX M. DEVINE; MICHAEL LOCKE; JAMES FELDER; R. NAJJAR, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-2195-3-11-BC)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rick Stearnsmiller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Rick Stearnsmiller noted an appeal from the district court’s order denying his appeal of a non-dispositive order entered by the magistrate judge in his underlying civil action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appeal- able. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.