Shabazz v. Garraghty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Shabazz v. Garraghty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6652

DEMBRY V. SHABAZZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID GARRAGHTY, Chief Warden; MARIE MILLARD, Assistant of Programs,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ANDREW OLIVER, Chaplain,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-598-2)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dembry V. Shabazz, Appellant Pro Se. Rick Randall Linker, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dembry V. Shabazz appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Shabazz v. Garraghty, No. CA-97-598-2 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 31, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished