UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1974

ROBERT E. LIPSCOMB, ex rel., United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND, at the District Court, Worcester County, Ocean City, Maryland; SNOW HILL, MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-99- 1599-MJG)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Lipscomb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert E. Lipscomb appeals the district court’s order remand- ing this action to the Maryland state court after finding no basis for removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1) (1994), and order deny- ing his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lipscomb v. Maryland, No. CA-99-1599-MJG (D. Md. June & July 2, 1999).* We deny Lipscomb’s motions for appointment of counsel, for amicus brief, for conditional dismissal, and for de- fault judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order denying the removal petition is marked as “filed” on July 1, 1999, the district court’s records show the judgment was entered on the docket sheet on July 2, 1999. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a), we consider the date the judgment was entered as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).