U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Kenny v. US Court of Appeals

Kenny v. US Court of Appeals
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 1999

Kenny v. US Court of Appeals

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1943

ROBERT JAMES KENNY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-296-3)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert James Kenny, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert James Kenny appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his civil action and imposing a pre-filing injunction.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kenny v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. CA-99-296-3 (E.D. Va. June 16, 1999).

We deny Kenny’s motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.