FTC v. Reed
FTC v. Reed
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1883
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DORIAN REED; AUDREY REED,
Defendants - Appellants, and
THOMAS MAHER; INTERNET BUSINESS BROADCASTING, INCORPORATED, a Nevada Corporation,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-495-WMN)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorian Reed, Audrey Reed, Appellants Pro Se. Lawrence DeMille- Wagman, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) filed an action against
Dorian and Audrey Reed, alleging violations of the Federal Trade
Commission Act. The district court entered a default judgment
against the Reeds for failing to answer the complaint or file other
defensive pleadings and then entered a final judgment against the
Reeds. The Reeds appeal, raising no issues concerning the final
judgment, but claiming that the default judgment was inappropriate
because they had served upon the FTC an answer and a motion to
quash.*
The appropriate remedy for challenging a default judgment is
to file in the district court a motion to set aside the default
judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), 60(b). The Reeds failed to
file such a motion in the district court. We therefore affirm the
district court’s final judgment without prejudice to the Reeds’
right to file in the district court a motion to set aside the
default judgment. We deny the Reeds’ motion seeking to stay the
appeal and to remand the case to the district court. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The court’s docket sheet does not reflect the filing of this answer.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished