U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1999

Crooks v. Moore

Crooks v. Moore
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 1999

Crooks v. Moore

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6632

THOMAS D. CROOKS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL W. MOORE, South Carolina Department of Corrections; RICKIE HARRISON, Warden; BOB STEWART, Chief, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division; LEON LOTT, Sheriff of Richland County; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-2458-2-17AJ)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 6, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas D. Crooks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Larry C. Batson, Sr., Lesli Brown Darwin, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Thomas D. Crooks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Crooks v. Moore, No. CA-98-2458-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.