UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1788

JAMES ARTHUR YOUNG, Candidate for US Senate, MD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DE- PARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOP- MENT; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS; NATIONAL AERO- NAUTICS AND SPACE AGENCY (NASA); SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, and other agencies; STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION, Glen Burnie Office; UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION; BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION; SPRINT; COMPUTER BASED SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99- 1479-L)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 46(d).

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arthur Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Arthur Young appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his civil action as legally frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Young v. United States, No. CA-99-1479-L (D. Md. June 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED