Stringer v. Nationwide Mutual

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Stringer v. Nationwide Mutual

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1742

MARTIN L. STRINGER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

RONALD JOSEPH DASTA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3355-3-17)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martin L. Stringer, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Robert Murphy, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Martin L. Stringer, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-

ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stringer

v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. CA-98-3355-3-17 (D.S.C. Apr. 26,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished