Stringer v. Nationwide Mutual
Stringer v. Nationwide Mutual
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1742
MARTIN L. STRINGER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
RONALD JOSEPH DASTA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3355-3-17)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin L. Stringer, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Robert Murphy, MURPHY & GRANTLAND, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Martin L. Stringer, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-
ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stringer
v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., No. CA-98-3355-3-17 (D.S.C. Apr. 26,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished