Clayton v. Fuji Copian Corp

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 5, 1999

Opinion

No. 99-1722

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-98-875-19-3)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marsha A. Clayton, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Pharr Pearson, Nicole Paul Cantey, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Marsha A. Clayton appeals the district court’s order denying

relief in her action against her former employer. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Clayton v. Fuji Copian Corp., No. CA-98-875-19-3

(D.S.C. May 5, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.