Clarkson v. Dept of Defense

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Clarkson v. Dept of Defense

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1569

ROBERT BARNWELL CLARKSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Special Operations Command,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1882-8-08BD)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Barnwell Clarkson, Appellant Pro Se. Frances Cornelia Trapp, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Robert Barnwell Clarkson appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying Clark-

son relief on his complaint filed under the Freedom of Information

Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-

ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Clarkson v. Department of Defense, No. CA-97-

1882-8-08BD (D.S.C. Apr. 6, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on April 5, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 6, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished