Arnold v. Navy Fed Credit Union
Arnold v. Navy Fed Credit Union
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1389
RACHEL ARNOLD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-1202-A)
Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 5, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rachel Arnold, Appellant Pro Se. Constantinos George Panagopoulos, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rachel Arnold appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in the employer’s favor in Arnold’s employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record, the district
court’s order, and the transcript of the summary judgment hearing
containing the court’s reasoning and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Arnold v. Navy Fed. Credit Union, No. CA-98-1202-A (E.D. Va. Feb.
12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished