Hughes v. Taylor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hughes v. Taylor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6957

LAWRENCE HUGHES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EDSEL T. TAYLOR, Warden; MACDOUGALL CORREC- TIONAL INSTITUTION; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attor- ney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-1736-2-20AJ)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 15, 1999

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Hughes appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 &

Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning

of the district court. See Hughes v. Taylor, No. CA-98-1736-20AJ

(D.S.C. June 22, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

* We note, however, that the district court’s dismissal is without prejudice to Hughes’ right to file in this court an appropriate petition pursuant to

28 U.S.C.A. § 2244

(West Supp. 1999).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished