United States v. Martinez
United States v. Martinez
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6738
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
ANDRES MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-251-A)
Submitted: October 7, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andres Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Andres Martinez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time in which to file a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court.
See United States v. Martinez, No. CR-96-251-A (E.D. Va. Apr. 19, 1999). We note for Martinez’s benefit, however, that a motion to extend is not necessary in this case because there is no time limit for filing a motion under § 2241. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.