CORRECTED OPINION UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 99-4095 KEITH ALAN COOTE, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-97-180) Submitted: September 14, 1999 Decided: October 4, 1999 Corrected opinion filed: October 14, 1999 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. _________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Michael A. Kolb, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J.

Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). _________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: Keith Alan Coote entered a "straight up" guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin within one thousand feet of a playground in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994). The court entered judgment against Coote on June 26, 1998. A letter by Coote, which was construed as notice of appeal, was filed on February 3, 1999. Because Coote's notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The Government has filed a motion to dismiss Coote's criminal appeal as untimely. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are"mandatory and jurisdictional." United States v. Raynor, 939 F.2d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 1991). Defendants in criminal prosecutions have ten days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal "[u]pon a showing of excusable neglect." Id. The district court entered judgment against Coote on June 26, 1998; Coote's "notice of appeal" was filed on February 3, 1999.

Coote's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this Court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. Accordingly, we grant the Government's motion to dismiss and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and oral argu- ment would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED