United States v. McArn

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. McArn

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6720

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EARNEST MCARN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-94-83, CA-96-1637-4-22)

Submitted: November 30, 1999 Decided: January 7, 2000

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earnest McArn, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Earnest McArn seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-

ing his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See United States v. McArn, Nos. CR-94-83; CA-96-

1637-4-22 (D.S.C. May 7, 1999). We also deny McArn’s motion for

the appointment of counsel and motion for general relief seeking a

loan of the district court record. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished