United States v. McArn
United States v. McArn
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6720
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EARNEST MCARN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-94-83, CA-96-1637-4-22)
Submitted: November 30, 1999 Decided: January 7, 2000
Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earnest McArn, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Earnest McArn seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 1999).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See United States v. McArn, Nos. CR-94-83; CA-96-
1637-4-22 (D.S.C. May 7, 1999). We also deny McArn’s motion for
the appointment of counsel and motion for general relief seeking a
loan of the district court record. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished