U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Blair v. Colonnas Shipyard

Blair v. Colonnas Shipyard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 2000

Blair v. Colonnas Shipyard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2091

LINVAL A. BLAIR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

COLONNAS SHIPYARD, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-1360-2)

Submitted: November 16, 1999 Decided: January 4, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Linval A. Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Ruth Litvin, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Linval A. Blair appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer and dismissing his em- ployment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Blair v. Colonnas Shipyard, Inc., No. CA-98-1360-2 (E.D. Va. July 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.