United States v. Cropp
United States v. Cropp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7041
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
CLYDE GARCIA CROPP, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-95-16, CA-98-630-R)
Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clyde Garcia Cropp, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Clyde Cropp appeals the district court’s orders summarily dismissing ground one and granting summary judgment to the United States on ground two of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cropp, Nos. CR-95-16; CA-98- 630-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 1998; July 22, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.