Richardson v. Shein

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richardson v. Shein

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1862

ALVEDA INGRAM RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARCIA G. SHEIN,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS LAW CENTER, INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-3439-CCB)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alveda Ingram Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua R. Treem, SCHULMAN, TREEM, KAMINKOW & GILDEN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Alveda Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying

her motion for summary judgment and granting Marcia Shein’s cross-

motion for summary judgment in Richardson’s legal malpractice and

breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-

ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richard-

son v. Shein, No. CA-97-3439-CCB (D. Md. May 27, 1999). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished