U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Richardson v. Shein

Richardson v. Shein
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 13, 2000

Richardson v. Shein

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1862

ALVEDA INGRAM RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MARCIA G. SHEIN, Defendant - Appellee, and

FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS LAW CENTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 97-3439-CCB)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alveda Ingram Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua R. Treem, SCHULMAN, TREEM, KAMINKOW & GILDEN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Alveda Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for summary judgment and granting Marcia Shein’s cross- motion for summary judgment in Richardson’s legal malpractice and breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richard- son v. Shein, No. CA-97-3439-CCB (D. Md. May 27, 1999). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.