UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7433

SAMUEL A. WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

L. MCGILL, Lieutenant; CHARLESTON COUNTY DE- TENTION CENTER; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; PAM CLADWELL; DOCTOR HARTNETT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-98-2642-5, CA-98-2644-5, CA-99-781-5)

Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 20, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel A. Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Senn, Charleston, South Carolina; Andrew Steven Halio, HALIO & HALIO, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Samuel A. Wilder appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilder v. McGill, Nos. CA-98-2642-5; CA-98-2644-5; CA-99-781-5 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on September 20, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 22, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).