McCoy v. Prado
McCoy v. Prado
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7588
FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARTA PRADO; DOCTOR WAYNE; DORTHY TRIBBLE, Admin-Nurse, Individual and Official Capacity; LOUISE STEWARD, Assistant Warden; JAMES PEGEUESS, Chief of Security; L. CHANEY, Cap- tain; R. MARTIN, Lieutenant; SERGEANT COWAN; D. INGRAM, Sergeant; MARLENE SHELBY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99- 1464-L)
Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 20, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, P.C., Rockville, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the ap-
peal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541(1949). The order here
appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory
or collateral order. See Miller v. Simmons,
814 F.2d 962, 967(4th
Cir. 1987).
We therefore dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished