Trent v. WSET
Trent v. WSET
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2523
JOHN J. “SWARTZ” TRENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
WHEELER PARTY, Plaintiff, versus
WSET; WDBJ; WSLS; THE NEWS AND ADVANCE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-99-80-6)
Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John J. Trent, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: John J. “Swartz” Trent appeals the district court’s order granting in forma pauperis status and dismissing the complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Trent v. WSET, No. CA-99-80-6 (W.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.