Edwards v. Dept of Air Force

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Edwards v. Dept of Air Force

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2610

MYRA R. EDWARDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, AFBCMR; MALCOLM GROW UNITED STATES AIR FORCE MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 98-4190)

Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Myra R. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Myra R. Edwards appeals the district court’s order denying her

motion to reopen her case based on newly discovered evidence. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Edwards v. Department of the Air Force

AFBCMR, No. CA-98-4190 (D. Md. Nov. 16, 1999).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 12, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 16, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35

(4th Cir. 1986).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished