Roberto v. Montgomery County MD

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Roberto v. Montgomery County MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2128

MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, A Body Corporate Politic; JOHN B. LEWIS; DAVID FALCINELLI, Officer; JOSEPH F. NAPOLI; MARION S. NAPOLI; MONIQUE HAFREY; MATTHEW W. BLACK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-1873-AW)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Muzio B. Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district

court’s orders dismissing their civil action and denying their mo-

tion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberto v.

Montgomery County, No. CA-99-1873-AW (D. Md. July 7 & Aug. 11,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished