U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Kenny v. US Court of Appeals

Kenny v. US Court of Appeals
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 28, 2000

Kenny v. US Court of Appeals

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2631

ROBERT JAMES KENNY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-296-3)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert James Kenny, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert James Kenny appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to re-open a prior case. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Kenny’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Kenny v. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. CA-99-296-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.