Browning v. State of WV
Browning v. State of WV
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2298
WAYNE BROWNING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-582-3)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Browning, Appellant Pro Se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Wayne Browning appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Browning v. State of West Virginia, No. CA-99-582-3 (S.D.W. Va.
Aug. 27, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished