Atilano v. United States
Atilano v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7586
ACEVEDO VALLE ATILANO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-99-535-2)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Acevedo Valle Atilano, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Acevedo Valle Atilano appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his action filed pursuant to the Fed-
eral Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680(1994). Our review of
the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Atilano v. United States, No. CA-99-535-2 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 4, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished