Illsley v. Hawks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Illsley v. Hawks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7632

EDWARD THOMAS ILLSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN HAWKS, Director, United States Bureau of Prisons; STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution; VIRGINIA STATE PAROLE BOARD, Director and Members,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-424)

Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Thomas Illsley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Edward Thomas Illsley appeals the district court’s order dis-

missing his action which it properly construed as filed under

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Illsley v. Hawks, No. CA-99-424 (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 1999). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished