U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Illsley v. Hawks

Illsley v. Hawks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 4, 2000

Illsley v. Hawks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7632

EDWARD THOMAS ILLSLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

KATHLEEN HAWKS, Director, United States Bureau of Prisons; STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution; VIRGINIA STATE PAROLE BOARD, Director and Members, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-424)

Submitted: January 18, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Thomas Illsley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Edward Thomas Illsley appeals the district court’s order dis- missing his action which it properly construed as filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Illsley v. Hawks, No. CA-99-424 (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.