Buckley v. Womack

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Buckley v. Womack

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7237

ELIJAH BUCKLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES WOMACK, Captain; BAKER, Deputy; B. JONES, Deputy; L. B. FOWKLER, Mrs.,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

RICHMOND CITY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-98-1225-AM)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 4, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elijah Buckley, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Skora, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & BUIS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Elijah Buckley appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Buckley v. Womack, No. CA-98-1225-AM (E.D.

Va. Aug. 20, 1999. Upon motion of Defendants Womack, Baker, Jones

and Fowkler we grant leave to the district court to correct a

clerical mistake under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). We deny Buckley’s

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished