Willard v. Arnette
Willard v. Arnette
Opinion
Filed: February 2, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7214 (CA-96-1827-6-13AK)
Jackie Willard, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
Correctional Officer J. Arnette, et al, Defendants - Appellees.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed February 18, 1998, as follows: On the cover sheet and in the text of the opinion -- the spelling of appellant’s name is corrected to read “Jackie Willard.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7214
JACKIE WILLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J. ARNETTE; LIEUTENANT H.
HENDERSON; SERGEANT MADDOX; CAPTAIN FAULKEN- BERRY; EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1827-6-13AK)
Submitted: February 3, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998
Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jackie Willard, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af- firm on the reasoning of the district court. Willard v. Arnette, No. CA-96-1827-6-13AK (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.