Moyers v. Ricchione
Moyers v. Ricchione
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1973
MARK MOYERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
BIANCA RICCHIONE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-125-MC)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 2, 2000
Before WILLIAMS,* MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Moyers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d). PER CURIAM:
Mark Moyers appeals the district court’s order of his civil
action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Moyers v. Ricchione, No. CA-
99-125-MC (D.S.C. June 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process. We also deny Moyers’ motion to remand.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished