U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Moyers v. Ricchione

Moyers v. Ricchione
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 2, 2000

Moyers v. Ricchione

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1973

MARK MOYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

BIANCA RICCHIONE, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-125-MC)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 2, 2000

Before WILLIAMS,* MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Moyers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

PER CURIAM: Mark Moyers appeals the district court’s order of his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moyers v. Ricchione, No. CA- 99-125-MC (D.S.C. June 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. We also deny Moyers’ motion to remand.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.