United States v. Spurlock
United States v. Spurlock
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7357
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICO LAMONT SPURLOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-95-29, CA-99-22)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: February 1, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rico Lamont Spurlock, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rico Lamont Spurlock seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certifi-
cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Spurlock, Nos. CR-95-29;
CA-99-22 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished